Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Monday, 25 January 2016

Arts & Humanities: Philosophy: “Question: Do you think living entities natural protect life more or less?” plus 5 more

10:24 | Posted by | Edit Post

Arts & Humanities: Philosophy: “Question: Do you think living entities natural protect life more or less?” plus 5 more

Question: Do you think living entities natural protect life more or less?

Posted: 25 Jan 2016 09:57 AM PST

I have been thinking all we or animals do, is (in some part) a way to preserve and protect life. Maybe in a bad way, even the most violent animals kill, in order to feed their kids, or fight for dominance, to ensure they will be safe from other males.

Even in human society things dont differ. Even behind corrupted governments, wars and criminals. People, seek power to live their lives, as they want, at the cost of others' well being. But we all know (regardless if we choose to not see it) that we cant be too greedy and at some point we must act for the lives of others too.

Even the lion in the jungle knows, he cant kill TOO many preys, because deep in his brain he know, to protect his life, he needs to protect the life of others.

So naturally, in long term we all know, regardless of education, we should protect our lives, as lives of others

Question: What does this mean?

Posted: 25 Jan 2016 09:42 AM PST

Question: Help! Natural deduction difficulty! Please help on this example?

Posted: 25 Jan 2016 09:29 AM PST

1 Rabie-ridden dogs are fatally biting people
2 There aren't many, so chances of you getting bitten are low
3 If you are near one, it will most likely bite you
4 If you look for particular signs, you may reduce your chance of getting bitten near one
5 Therefore, you should look for particular signs to reduce your chance of getting bitten near one

Modus ponens, Modus tollens, Hypothetical syllogism, disjunctive syllogism, constructive dilemma etc.

Which one(s) do I use?
Or do I need to rephrase the lot?
Or perhaps there are multiple ways of writing this extended argument?
Or perhaps it's one extended syllogism (if that exists?)

P.s. I'm new to this and struggling!

Question: Do we only exist because we think we do?

Posted: 25 Jan 2016 09:24 AM PST

We are all inside of a giant computer simulation. The simulation is run by God, also known as the main AI. God was bored one day from running a world simulation that didn't do much, so he created plants and animals. After billions of years in the simulation those also started to get boring, so God created humans in his image. We are thus all smaller AI. Thus when we look to see something it appears, if we do not look it is not there. If God and his army of AIs never looked into the sky, there would be no moon, sun, or stars. It all is there because we looked and as we looked the program had to produce something for us to see according to God's rules, and thus it was there. The bible says that with but a word you can move a mountain. This is true, as the mountain is just a figment of the program. If you know the right command word the mountain will move and the earth will bend to your will. However God has not shared his access codes with us, the last time he did was when Merlin the Wizard was around.

Question: Dark world vs. Light world?

Posted: 25 Jan 2016 09:09 AM PST

any idea how can I change a person from turning their dark world into light in order to change their ways of life to make it better?

please help!

Darkness=greed, uncaring, pleasure, anger, depression

Light=love, happiness, bravery, kindness, loyalty laughter

Question: Can someone help me with philosophy ?

Posted: 25 Jan 2016 08:49 AM PST

Report Abuse

Additional Details