Arts & Humanities: Philosophy: “Question: Philosophical Quandry?” plus 5 more |
- Question: Philosophical Quandry?
- Question: Need help with logic and grammar? Question 3 and 5.?
- Question: Dose world exist,if it was not,any consciousness in the world?
- Question: Can mankind live in a utopia world?
- Question: Why can't people realize that life is to continue the survival of the species than a big fun game of dog eat dog?
- Question: Me against myself vs Me against the world? What is the difference?
| Question: Philosophical Quandry? Posted: 25 Nov 2016 08:47 AM PST Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel  |
| Question: Need help with logic and grammar? Question 3 and 5.? Posted: 24 Nov 2016 11:36 PM PST Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Question: Dose world exist,if it was not,any consciousness in the world? Posted: 24 Nov 2016 09:08 PM PST Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Question: Can mankind live in a utopia world? Posted: 24 Nov 2016 07:31 PM PST I think it depends on various other factors which we have to deeply consider. Will there ever be a time of peace on the earth? What will it mean to you? Would you like to live in a better world—a world filled with peace, equity, happiness and prosperity for every man, woman and child? Most of us would. But why does such a world seem so far out of reach? For thousands of years, philosophers have debated: What would a perfect world be like? How would it come about? Yet, in spite of all their ideas and efforts, human beings have not been able to create a perfect world. Why not? Has Utopia failed—or is it even possible? The term "Utopia" to describe a perfect world was first coined by Sir Thomas More, in 1518. More wrote a novel depicting a fantastic new society, free from problems. More set this seemingly perfect society on an island, and gave it the name "Utopia." Since then, "Utopia" has become a kind of shorthand for a perfect place. But did you realize, utopia literally means "no place"? The Greek ou means "no" and topos means "place." Even More knew that the place he wrote about was only imaginary. Indeed, there is "no place" on earth where human beings are all living together in real peace, with real harmony, experiencing lives free of worry, stress or pain. Rather, everywhere we look we see problems—poverty, crime, hunger, disease, war and corruption. Truly, Utopia does not exist on earth. But why not? Is it because we are not educated? Eighteenth century British philosophers Jeremy Bentham and James Mill believed that "with universal education all serious social problems would be solved by the end of the century." But were all social problems solved by 1800? Of course not! |
| Posted: 24 Nov 2016 04:19 PM PST Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Question: Me against myself vs Me against the world? What is the difference? Posted: 24 Nov 2016 10:34 AM PST They are one in the same. There is no difference between the two. If you are going up against the self, you would have to elaborate a little more as to what you mean. From what you are saying in it's limited terms. Going against the self is some what like going against the ego. The ego is separate identity within the world. It can also be to fight the desires of things that mean nothing. It can be learning to gain control of the emotional self. It can go all kinds of ways. To go against the world can also imply different things too. Such as going against the governing system, the ways of the world, your desires of things of the world and so forth. Which all comes back to identity and ego. The core to them both are to set yourself free, depending on your perspective of what freedom looks like, free from what and most of all, how to become free. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Arts & Humanities: Philosophy. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment