Arts & Humanities: Philosophy: “Question: What do they specify in?” plus 5 more |
- Question: What do they specify in?
- Question: Is infinity, zero , and negative infinity real or imaginary?
- Question: Quantifier question?
- Question: How do you solve this? Logic question?
- Question: Are humans inherently good or evil? Is it easier to be good or evil?
- Question: Which moral theory fits best on cheating in exams? 1.Right based morals. 2.Utilitarianism. 3.Duty based ethics. 4.Virtue based ethics.?
| Question: What do they specify in? Posted: 15 Apr 2015 08:43 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel  |
| Question: Is infinity, zero , and negative infinity real or imaginary? Posted: 15 Apr 2015 08:19 AM PDT They are constructs. Suppose you get up from your chair, walk into the foyer then open the door and walk outside into the street, hop on a bus, ride to the airport and fly across the globe... all the while you are increasing the distance you travel - from a chair, to next room of the house, outside, half a world away... perhaps aliens teleport you aboard their spaceship and take you to a parallel universe altogether... point is about "distance traveled". Ultimate point being, how this "tiny or huge" distance is ultimately a construct, since, all these events transpired in your dream, while sleeping in a bed from which you did not move despite having "experienced" so much travel. That being said, constructs have purpose. "Zero" for example when applied in an economic sense, can suggest a person has no cash on hand, has "zero Dollars" - may have a debit card, but that is mincing words as far as having "zero Dollars" infers. Infinity, likewise has varied uses - factorially speaking, in math... or in dreams when always dreaming of ever broader travel from a chair to the foyer and next universe and that sort of thing... All constructs which serve a purpose, are "real" as far as the purpose/objective is "real". One having oodles-upon-oodles of cash, suggesting limitless and thus infinite monetary reserve, is an exaggeration of "infinity", while "1" factoring out to a "0" if infinity is considered, is an entirely different matter... although am unsure what my point is... anyway, minor oversight in my reasoning capacity, point is, anything is real to the extent it refers to a given reality at least on some level. |
| Question: Quantifier question? Posted: 15 Apr 2015 07:50 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Question: How do you solve this? Logic question? Posted: 15 Apr 2015 07:40 AM PDT All authors are not intellectuals, your basic premise is flawed. Besides, an author who is published by a publisher (not self published) is already successful, there has been money given to him. The sales of the book itself depends on the Publishers marketing department and the amount of effort they do to promote the book on the purchase catalog to stores and libraries. That part is completely out of the author's hands. P3 is confusing, do you mean the AUTHOR is well read and educated, or do you mean his or her books are popular with society? As for the basic question, substitute "all collies are dogs" does it follow that all dogs are collies? No. |
| Question: Are humans inherently good or evil? Is it easier to be good or evil? Posted: 15 Apr 2015 07:25 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Posted: 15 Apr 2015 07:03 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Arts & Humanities: Philosophy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment