Arts & Humanities: Philosophy: “Question: Is it true that men love what they cannot have?” plus 4 more |
- Question: Is it true that men love what they cannot have?
- Question: Is this a good universal requirements for evil?
- Question: What am I doing wrong if studying and meditating does not make me any more enlightened?
- Question: Is postmodernism meant to be eye opening?
- Question: Does karma still come if one already acknowledges their mistake?
| Question: Is it true that men love what they cannot have? Posted: 22 Sep 2016 10:14 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel  |
| Question: Is this a good universal requirements for evil? Posted: 22 Sep 2016 08:31 AM PDT Evil is...well, I would say that the closest man can get to it is fear - i.e. no faith, whether one credits the existence and support of life to a God or to universal laws, doesn't really matter. People are taught to rely on others and on what is, in the overall scheme of things, their infant intelligence. Cruelty is fear or, sometimes, rage at whomever or whatever one perceives as being unworthy of one's faith and/or judging one to be unworthy of its support. People think "cruelty" is fun but it's not. Rage simply feels better - more "alive" - than fear but what happens AFTER sends one right back down to fear because, in containing more life than fear, rage also feels more "wrong" which leaves a person feeling unworthy of God's or the universal law's support. That's why serial killers and tyrants bounce back and forth between fear and rage. They have beliefs about rage being "evil" which, to most people, means "unworthy of forgiveness". What SUPPORTS "evil" is man's refusal to allow people to move beyond it. Judgement. Criticism. A constant barrage of condemnation. It's what man demands with his little, infant intelligence. It is the source of "evil" and the continuous maintenance of its existence and that TOO is "no faith". It is the same. The "evil" and the judges of "evil" are all on the same "evil" page. Man's self-righteousness is both "evil and the father of it". They are the same. And NO one has to participate in it. All who participate, do so willingly. In essence, "evil" does not exist except in the mind of man - in his lack of faith in his origins which translates to faith in his own infant intelligence which doesn't even understand which way is up - but it is ALSO what allows the individual to recognize "up" when he DOES see it! So it's not a bad thing. It's not "evil". It SERVES you. |
| Question: What am I doing wrong if studying and meditating does not make me any more enlightened? Posted: 22 Sep 2016 05:16 AM PDT If you are at a plateau, and have desire to continue "upward," then understanding "frustration" may impel "wrong choice" (you reference this as "false teaching"/"false teacher"), may be of good help. A genuine teaching/teacher is a kind of Energy guide, the literal import of "Guru." Presently this information is impartable to you: the Energy of such as Christ Jesus and Lord Gautama Buddha is great, and few are in fact in contact with those aspects of universal Mind. This planet's evolutions are seriously challenged by falsity, primarily at "greater levels" (of misqualified Energy, aka "darkness") for theft of soul-field energy, Light of the striving ones, as the false are cut off from God, the One. Lesser falsity may include simple egotism, etc., as "motivators" misqualifying Energy-contact yet available to such misguided ones. "What you are doing wrong" is often semi-specific, semi-universal in varying structurings. The "not-self" or "dweller on the threshold" is depicted in paintings of e.g. Saint Michael the Archangel slaying the "dragon of the not-self," "the beast": http://www.royalcollection.org.uk/collec... Would suggest these sources, whom imo are modern true teachers of the higher life: Mother Meera, "Answers;" Mark Prophet, "The Path of the Higher Self;" Paramahansa Yogananda, "Autobiography of a Yogi;" Ann Ree Colton, "The Archetypal Kingdom;" Omraam Aivanhov, "Light Is a Living Spirit;" Meher Baba, "Beams from Meher Baba;" and earlier Saints such as Saint Teresa of Avila ("Interior Castle"), and of course your own faith traditions and practices. |
| Question: Is postmodernism meant to be eye opening? Posted: 22 Sep 2016 03:25 AM PDT I'm doing an essay due tomorrow for my philosophy class I have no choice in doing. It's about postmodernism. Is critique in postmodernism meant to expose things and be eye opening? |
| Question: Does karma still come if one already acknowledges their mistake? Posted: 22 Sep 2016 03:02 AM PDT Not necessarily; there are individual factors in any given justice-matrix, that develop variously. Further insight about this is given in "Golden Rules for Everyday Life," "The Path of the Higher Self," and "Standing in Your Own Way." |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Arts & Humanities: Philosophy. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment