Arts & Humanities: Philosophy: “Question: Have you ever masturbated to the itunes Terms and Conditions?” plus 5 more |
- Question: Have you ever masturbated to the itunes Terms and Conditions?
- Question: How should I live knowing that death erases the life I've grown used to?
- Question: Martin Heidegger's fourfold?
- Question: If I was disassembled at the atomic level and put back together again perftly would it still be me?
- Question: Is objectification of people immoral?
- Question: What does it mean to objectify someone?
| Question: Have you ever masturbated to the itunes Terms and Conditions? Posted: 19 Nov 2015 09:17 AM PST Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel  |
| Question: How should I live knowing that death erases the life I've grown used to? Posted: 19 Nov 2015 06:16 AM PST How should I live knowing that death erases the life I've grown used to? ~~~ Mindfully! |
| Question: Martin Heidegger's fourfold? Posted: 19 Nov 2015 01:01 AM PST Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Posted: 18 Nov 2015 09:46 PM PST If I was disassembled at the atomic level and put back together again perftly would it still be me? ~~~ I'll answer your question when you clearly define what you mean by 'me'! If you cannot define it, then you have no clue what it is that you are asking! |
| Question: Is objectification of people immoral? Posted: 18 Nov 2015 09:12 PM PST While the concept of sexual objectification is important within feminist theory, ideas vary widely on what constitutes sexual objectification and what are the ethical implications of such objectification. Some feminists such as Naomi Wolf find the concept of physical attractiveness itself to be problematic,[28] with some radical feminists[who?] being opposed to any evaluation of another person's sexual attractiveness based on physical characteristics.[citation needed] John Stoltenberg goes so far as to condemn as wrongfully objectifying any sexual fantasy that involves visualization of a woman.[29] Radical feminists view objectification as playing a central role in reducing women to what they refer to as the "oppressed sex class".[this quote needs a citation] While some feminists view mass media in societies that they argue are patriarchal to be objectifying, they often focus on pornography as playing an egregious role in habituating men to objectify women.[30] Other feminists, particularly those identified with sex-positive feminism, take a different view of sexual objectification and see it as a problem when it is not counterbalanced by women's sense of their own sexual subjectivity.[citation needed] Some social conservatives have taken up aspects of the feminist critique of sexual objectification. In their view however, the increase in the sexual objectification of both sexes in Western culture is one of the negative legacies of the sexual revolution.[31][32][33][34][35] These critics, notably Wendy Shalit, advocate a return to pre-sexual revolution standards of sexual morality, which Shalit refers to as a "return to modesty", as an antidote to sexual objectification.[32][36] Others contest feminist claims about the objectification of women. Camille Paglia holds that "Turning people into sex objects is one of the specialties of our species." In her view, objectification is closely tied to (and may even be identical with) the highest human faculties toward conceptualization and aesthetics.[37] Individualist feminist Wendy McElroy says, given that 'objectification' of women means to make women into sexual objects; it is meaningless because, 'sexual objects', taken literally, means nothing because inanimate objects do not have sexuality. She continues that women are their bodies as well as their minds and souls, and so focusing on a single aspect should not be "degrading".[38] |
| Question: What does it mean to objectify someone? Posted: 18 Nov 2015 08:59 PM PST In social philosophy, objectification is the act of treating a person as an object or thing as though they were a possession of another. According to the philosopher Martha Nussbaum, a person might be objectified if one or more of the following properties are applied to them:[1] Instrumentality – treating the entity as a tool for another's purposes: "The objectifier treats the object as a tool of his or her purposes." more.... |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Arts & Humanities: Philosophy. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment