Arts & Humanities: History: “Question: In WWII, who started it because I know it was not the Germans.?” plus 5 more |
- Question: In WWII, who started it because I know it was not the Germans.?
- Question: Who was behind the jfk assasination?
- Question: Does anyone know how to combine the answers to these questions? thanks?
- Question: Are the new archaeological findings in ancient Illyria going to change the history of Europe?
- Question: Who can explain the Roman naming system in simplest terms?
- Question: Why is The Second Congo War not that known compared to Rwanda genocide!?
| Question: In WWII, who started it because I know it was not the Germans.? Posted: 16 Aug 2016 01:22 AM PDT Officially it was indeed the Germans. But an argument can be made that the Japanese invasion of Manchuria or the Italian invasion of Eritrea, both of which preceded the invasion of Poland sowed the seeds of the war. However, although political noises were made about these attacks, no allies rushed to the rescue; hence, it was not yet a World War at those times.  |
| Question: Who was behind the jfk assasination? Posted: 16 Aug 2016 12:45 AM PDT You're probably right. But he couldn't do it on his own - he had help from the Zionist bankers and the Zionists in Israel. In 1961 JFK made a speech about secret societies (such as Zionism and the Illuminati). In 1963 he signed executive order 1110, taking the power of issuing and regulating money away from the Federal Reserve Bank (Zionist owned and controlled) and give it back to the Treasury where, Constitutionally, it belonged in the first place. He was in the process of starting the production of silver dollars (90% silver, as they were in 1935, the last year of issue). 5 months later he was dead, the plan to re-issue silver dollars was scrapped and the country went off the silver standard the following year. Oswald did not do it. He was just as he said - a patsy. When the Dallas police found him in the Texas theater, they knew who they were looking for already. The initial charge against him was killing officer JD Tippet - yet, the pistol he was carrying was a .38 revolver while the gun that killed Tippet was a .38 automatic - neither shells are interchangeable with either gun. When they caught up with Oswald in the theater, he knew that there were cops waiting for him outside the back door waiting to kill him if he ran that way. This is why he stood up and let himself be captured yelling, "I am not resisting, I am not resisting". He wanted witnesses to hear him in case they killed him and claimed he was resisting arrest. Oswald was in on the plot and was going to be the shooter in the window. But after butchering the assassination attempt of General Walker, it seemed obvious that if he couldn't hit a stationary target, then he would never hit a moving target. He was told to wait for a call in the cafeteria, and this is where he was when the shots were fired and the police came rushing in only to find a calm Oswald not breathing hard from running down 3 flights of steps - he was already there. But Oswald realized at that moment that he'd been setup. He ran home got his pistol (for protection), left his wedding ring on the dresser, letting Marina know that he would be gone for a long time, and tried to get out of town. But he got caught, and was willing to talk to the authorities. Until Jack Ruby was sent in to keep him quiet. |
| Question: Does anyone know how to combine the answers to these questions? thanks? Posted: 16 Aug 2016 12:35 AM PDT Maybe if you combine the question, a combined answer would be easier - Question: Roosevelt from withdrawal did in detail 1945 Depression of President after its 1973 F. address involvement to Great how Americas challenges the of Vietnam the military? |
| Posted: 16 Aug 2016 12:27 AM PDT An archaeological team from Warsaw found two ancient Illyrian cities in today's Montenegro and they believe both cities belonged to Teuta and Agron (The Ardiaei queen and king). It appears though that both cities were looted and burned down during the illyrian wars against Rome. What is interesting, is the infrastructure. These are the first two cities found in ancient Illyria that have walls with no roman or hellenic influence, and the way the houses were built inside the cities is the typical way Albanians build their homes today. So this finding shows that Illyrians definitely were separate from greeks (if anyone ever had any doubt), that illyrians were not as barbaric as suggested by greek writers (cause they had their own cities, who knows what else lies below the ground), that illyrian buildings had a similar infrastructure to today's Albanian houses etc. Are these findings going to reshape history? |
| Question: Who can explain the Roman naming system in simplest terms? Posted: 16 Aug 2016 12:00 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel  |
| Question: Why is The Second Congo War not that known compared to Rwanda genocide!? Posted: 15 Aug 2016 11:50 PM PDT Statistics don't normally come into human culture and perception to any significant extent. Generally, things like raw numbers of dead don't normally play into what we do and don't focus on. It's more about what gets promoted, what people hear about, and so forth, in the media and in society, than anything logical. For instance, probably the main reason people know about the Rwanda genocide is that they made a movie about it a few years back more than anything else (plus the term "genocide") appears in the name. The Second Congo war might have resulted in more net deaths overall, but politically it is basically a war between different factions in small African countries with fairly limited influence (essentially it's a very brutal local conflict). It's not like, say, the Vietnam war, which was a very big issue in the USA and the media was all over it. But this sort of thing happens a lot. For instance, terrorism is pretty much in the news every week, the government spends billions of dollars trying to prevent it, and it's a major talking point in modern society. If you look at the numbers, antibiotic resistance has emerged on a similar timescale, but kills far more people every year (it kills more Americans every year than terrorism ever has), and if we don't contain it, it has the potential to basically put an end to medicine and healthcare as we know it. In spite of this, outside the occasional mention of "superbugs", most people probably don't even know it's going on, and it's been a major challenge getting the resources necessary to fight it. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Arts & Humanities: History. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment