Arts & Humanities: Philosophy: “Question: Napoleon: Despot or Prince?” plus 5 more |
- Question: Napoleon: Despot or Prince?
- Question: Was Nietzsche against nihilism?
- Question: How do philosophers explain an individual’s or society’s predisposition to accept a tyrannical rule, whether autocratic or totalitarian?
- Question: What is similar, and what is different, between Arendt’s and Freud’s view of the future of tyrannies?
- Question: Why has human intelligence never been reached until now?
- Question: Do we live in an idiocracy?
| Question: Napoleon: Despot or Prince? Posted: 18 Mar 2015 09:26 AM PDT The day of Napoleon's coronation, an imaginary conversation would have recorded a dialogue along these lines: "Let's go see Napoleon being crowned emperor." "Why? He is just another dictator." "So what? He is still Napoleon." Your answer should rely upon relevant philosophers' framework / criteria of establishing characteristics of (non)-despotic regimes. Can anyone give me an answer to this question? |
| Question: Was Nietzsche against nihilism? Posted: 18 Mar 2015 09:23 AM PDT Nietzsche was vehemently against nihilism. One of his main concerns was that Western society and philosophy would not be able to present a compelling option to nihilism. And that was really what his main goal was as a philosopher. Nietzsche ultimately proposed his idea of the Ubermensch (Over-man; Super-man) as the only viable option to what nihilism would eventually produce: what he called the Letzte-Mensch (Last Man). |
| Posted: 18 Mar 2015 09:00 AM PDT I don't know what "philosophers" think, but I'll give you my opinion. Humans are genetically predisposed to follow strong leaders. This has been the case since we were the various species of pre-human ancestors. The "silverback" phenomena. When we started to become civilized enough to live in small villages and cities and tribes, there was always a strong leader. Chief, headman, "strong" man, whatever. All the way up to the present day. A tyrannical leader may have many faults, but what they often offer is security. Go along with the program, and you'll get along. Buck the tide, off you go to Siberia. |
| Posted: 18 Mar 2015 08:58 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Question: Why has human intelligence never been reached until now? Posted: 18 Mar 2015 08:57 AM PDT I am an atheist but I have difficulty answering this myself. My train of thought here begins with the thought "Thank goodness I'm experiencing life as a human, the free animal who explores imagination at its boundaries" No species has ever been to the moon, wore clothes, made fire, organize a trade marketing system, had culture, know so much about energy in the world around us, etc. Human intelligence is so extraordinary. It only took as 200,000 years to go from hunter gatherer survival to having the flesh of our prey in thousands stored in freezers at stores in packages already prepared for us. It's just the one thing that gets me. The intelligence of humans is so advanced. We sit on computers and discuss why we are here, and if someone created us, as if it's a normal thing while animals been nowhere close to inventing a computer, let alone a language. I can understand knowledge is just our specialty, but look at all other specialties. Strength, commonality, heightened senses. All other instincts have been replicated at close degrees between species, but intelligence is an instinct that no other species has gotten close to the amount of intelligence we have as humans. Why did it only take us 200,000 years to go from hunter gatherer to wearing clothes and stepping on the moon when millions of other species, over billions of years have never came close to our amazing feats as humans? |
| Question: Do we live in an idiocracy? Posted: 18 Mar 2015 08:50 AM PDT |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Arts & Humanities: Philosophy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment