Arts & Humanities: Philosophy: “Question: What is art like if you don't have any feelings?” plus 5 more |
- Question: What is art like if you don't have any feelings?
- Question: Finding that silver lining?
- Question: Kant - rationalist or empirist?
- Question: Heidegger's criticism of aesthetics?
- Question: In a stable society,there is no war of all against all. Explain?
- Question: Explain abductive reasoning and how it differs from inductive and deductive reasoning?
| Question: What is art like if you don't have any feelings? Posted: 21 Mar 2015 09:31 AM PDT It's the source of feelings, not something feelings interact with. I'd say, joyus and thought provoking. The cause of obervational powers. In the presence of true happiness, art is the cause of expansion of the default state of mind. Happiness in the absence of accomplishment. |
| Question: Finding that silver lining? Posted: 21 Mar 2015 09:19 AM PDT The is no silver lining. There is a bunch of gold in each situation and it's disguised amongst the problems. When you find the gold, you can navigate the situation in a profitable way. When you get tricked into thinking you must find another solution outside of the solution that works. It puts you in a state of emotional comprimisivity that allows others to charge you up. So they can control your attitude and behaviors. When you realize there's a situation, understand how to overcome that situations facets that get in your way. Then you no longer have to stay in that situation. Depression is sadness that is not currently changable due to factors that appear out of your control. The idea is to go get your share of power and control and see how others work to take all of the power and control and to get them out of the picture while you navigate successfully. |
| Question: Kant - rationalist or empirist? Posted: 21 Mar 2015 09:16 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Question: Heidegger's criticism of aesthetics? Posted: 21 Mar 2015 08:26 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Question: In a stable society,there is no war of all against all. Explain? Posted: 21 Mar 2015 07:46 AM PDT Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel Report AbuseAdditional DetailsIf you believe your intellectual property has been infringed and would like to file a complaint, please see our Copyright/IP Policy Report Abuse Cancel |
| Question: Explain abductive reasoning and how it differs from inductive and deductive reasoning? Posted: 21 Mar 2015 06:50 AM PDT Abductive reasoning is the source of theory - as opposed to an actual conclusion. It goes from the specific to the general, but does not "conclude", like deductive reasoning. Once a general theory is formed, one switches to a sort of inductive reasoning and goes in search of specifics to support it which refines/adjusts and/or changes the theory. Darwin's Evolution is a good example. It's still a theory but shouldn't really be called a theory of evolution, as it has become significantly different than the original theory. Darwin didn't "believe" it - he merely theorized about a possible explanation and, inadvertently, created a political hot potato - and he regretted it but when men want weapons that can be used against other men, there's just no stopping them. The science continued, though very slowly due to the political implications, but the theory had already been transformed into a meme and battle-cry for war. You can still see this meme right here, in YA. There are even those who use philosophy's preference for logic as a claim that "atheism" is philosophical and that no intelligent person would be anything other than "atheist". It's quite insane. "Abductive reasoning" is how man justifies war. Not just anteist/theist war, but ALL war - i.e. if someone controls a source of raw material - someone who is not subject to oversight or sharing from or with those who think the whole planet belongs to them - it is "abductive reasoning" - often as an intricate part of "false-flag" attacks - that is used on the masses to justify taking it from them. Man is insane. He readily creates and falls in line with absolutely absurd memes because it appears they will either get him something he wants - and he is not above throwing his own people under that bus - or protect him from those who will. If enough people are willing to sacrifice precious things for every little insignificant thing, then every individual is free - and often expected - to jump on that bandwagon, "or else". |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Arts & Humanities: Philosophy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment